# Synthesis: Cross-Chapter Dialogue Mapping — Chapter 3 Argument

## Section 6.1 — Potential Dialogue with Chapter 4 (draft not provided)

Chapter 4 was not provided in the ground-truth input for this synthesis task.
If Chapter 4 argues that institutions with stronger governance structures
systematically outperform peers on accreditation dimensions, this chapter's
regulatory compliance framing could dialogue by specifying the statutory
mechanisms through which governance quality translates into measurable
compliance outcomes. The nature and direction of that dialogue depends on
what Chapter 4 actually argues, which cannot be determined from the available
materials.

## Section 6.2 — Potential Dialogue with Chapter 5 (draft not provided)

Chapter 5 was not provided in the ground-truth input. If Chapter 5 employs
multi-level modelling to decompose accreditation outcome variance, this chapter
could contribute the regulatory mechanism layer that links governance-level
variables to the institutional compliance behaviours that those models observe.
Specific dialogue points will be developed once Chapter 5 is available for review.
