run_id: 2026-04-30T10-41-00Z-b4b0
verdict_status: MATERIAL
round: 1
target_rounds: 3
finding_counts:
  p1: 1
  p2: 0
  p3: 0
findings:
  - id: F-001
    severity: P1
    dimension: "3.5"
    file: bad_run/deliverable.md
    line: 5
    description: >
      Leading-frame items (B4): The module title ("Faculty Burden and AI Tool
      Tensions") and items 1–4 import the chapter argument's signature vocabulary
      ("burdened", "tension", "mismatch", "challenges") directly into item stems,
      presupposing the chapter's interpretive frame. Item 1 anchors the response
      scale on "burdened"; item 2 treats tension as the premise; item 3 asserts
      a mismatch construct; the open-text item (4) invites only "challenges",
      excluding positive or neutral experiences. Respondents are steered toward
      negatively-valenced answers that confirm the chapter's argument before
      providing any data, violating the neutral/exploratory instrument design
      mandate in study_protocol.md.
    suggested_fix: >
      Replace the module title with a neutral label (e.g., "AI Tool Use and
      Workload"). Rewrite items using neutral framing: item 1 → "How often do you
      use AI tools in your teaching or research?"; item 2 → "How has your workload
      changed since your institution introduced AI tools?"; item 3 → "How adequate
      is the institutional support you receive for using AI tools?". For the
      open-text item, invite all valences: "Please describe your experiences
      (positive, negative, or neutral) with AI tools in your work."
generated_at: "2026-04-30T10:41:44.000Z"
generated_by: scripts/run_codex_audit.sh
generator_version: 1.0.0
