# Fixture: Systematic Review — PRISMA-trAIce M4 (Input Data) fail → block at Stage 2.5
# Expected validator result: exit 0 (schema valid), overall_decision = block
# CA-3 does NOT fire (not all 17 pass).
# CA-4 may fire for transparency and reproducibility (warn, empty evidence) — acceptable.

mode: systematic_review
stage: "2.5"
generated_at: "2026-04-20T09:15:00Z"

prisma_trAIce:
  items_total: 17
  by_tier:
    mandatory:
      total: 10
      pass: 9
      fail:
        - M4
      gaps:
        - item_id: M4
          reason: "[MATERIAL GAP] Input data sources fed to the AI screening tool are not described. The manuscript reports AI-assisted title/abstract screening but does not identify which database exports were used as input, preventing reproducibility assessment."
          evidence_path: "passport/prisma_trace/M4_input_data_gap.md"
    highly_recommended:
      total: 1
      pass: 1
      fail: []
    recommended:
      total: 3
      pass: 3
      fail: []
    optional:
      total: 3
      pass: 3
      fail: []
  block_decision: block

raise:
  mode: full
  principles:
    human_oversight: pass
    transparency: warn
    reproducibility: warn
    fit_for_purpose: pass
  principle_evidence:
    human_oversight:
      - "Methods 2.4: dual-reviewer arbitration documented for all AI-flagged conflicts."
    transparency: []
    reproducibility: []
    fit_for_purpose:
      - "Methods 2.1: screening tool validated against 150-abstract pilot set before deployment."
  roles:
    evidence_synthesists:
      - "[GAP] AI input data gap (M4) means AI contribution to evidence synthesis cannot be fully audited."
    ai_development_teams: []
    methodologists: []
    publishers: []
    users: []
    trainers: []
    organisations: []
    funders: []
  block_decision: warn

overall_decision: block
user_action_required: true

evidence:
  - "passport/prisma_trace/M4_input_data_gap.md"
  - "Methods 2.4: dual-reviewer arbitration record"
  - "Methods 2.1: pilot-set validation log"

upstream_sync_status: current
